ON THE MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME COURT RULING



I've haven't yet made any comments about the Massachusetts Supreme Court decision regarding gay marriage, but in light of the yesterday's legislative opinion to the Massachusetts State Senate, I have a few observations:

• I find it interesting, and pretty ridiculous, that a court has ordered the state legislature to pass a law, and even specified a 150-day deadline to comply. Doesn't this strike anyone as a bit odd? The decision strikes at the heart of legislative supremacy, and in my view will ultimately result in the same divisiveness as caused by Roe v Wade.
• The court decision makes the following proclamation about marriage: "We construe civil marriage to mean the voluntary union of two persons as spouses, to the exclusion of all others." This is sloppy at best. John Derbyshire at National Review Online had this to say: "Do you, by God! Then you are construing it in a way it has never been construed before. I see nothing in your "construal" to prevent me from marrying my sister, for example. Is this actually OK in the state of Massachusetts?" The cultural institution of marriage predates the constitutional order as we know it today. So unless an activist court arbitrarily "construes" marriage in this fashion, you will find nothing in either the US or Massachusetts constitutions which allows for gay marriage.

Whether you support or oppose the concept of gay marriage (I oppose it), I think it's pretty clear that the normal constitutional order is under assault. You can count on this becoming a presidential election issue because, as soon as the MA law is signed, a gay couple from, say, California, is going to run there, get married, and then go home and demand that California recognize the marriage. This is going to happen, and the result will be a federal Constitutional amendment.

MEANWHILE IN BRUSSELS



Maarten Schenk has this little bit o' BBC fun at his blog:

NOT SO BORING POWERPOINT



Late last year, Don Nunn, an old friend of mine, featured a piece on the "dumbing down" of America via Microsoft PowerPoint over at his Spiel blog. Well, I suddenly remembered that Maria Bartiromo, famous CNBC anchor-babe, recently hosted a segment of David Byrne, former front man of the band Talking Heads.



It seems that Mr. Byrne has been preoccupied with PowerPoint as art. You can read and see some of his work here at Wired.com. Byrne's work with Dan Rather's head is particularly good.

THE CONTINUING TERRORIST THREAT



The discovery of the deadly poison ricin in Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's mail is very disturbing, and it raises an interesting point, as proclaimed in today's lead editorial in the Wall Street Journal (available today at Opinionjournal.com):

The ricin letters are also a reminder that the threat of terror remains clear and present. There's been a lot of talk lately that the failure to discover any stockpiles of WMD in Iraq proves that the terror threat isn't "imminent" and that we can return to our pre-9/11 way of countering it. Is ricin's arrival in a Senate mailroom imminent enough?

Good question.

WMD FOUND



A discovery in Baghdad:

A 7-pound block of cyanide salt was discovered by U.S. troops in Baghdad at the end of January, officials confirmed to Fox News.



The potentially lethal compound was located in what was believed to be the safe house of Abu Musab Zarqawi, a poisons specialist described by some U.S. intelligence officials as having been a key link between deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and the Al Qaeda terror network.



Cyanides salts are extremely toxic. According to the U.S. Department of Energy's Ames Laboratory, exposure to even a small amount through contact or inhalation can cause immediate death.

As I recall my high-school AP chemistry class, cyanide kills by displacing the oxygen in hemoglobin. Victims of a cyanide attack die of asphyxiation. Not pleasant at all.



But here are three observations I took from this small story, a story which has appeared on no other major news network:

• There is increasing evidence of links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, despite what Garry Trudeau thinks.
• Imagine how difficult it is to find 7 pounds of anything in a country the size of Iraq. This is the big problem with WMD -- you can keep all of the agents in small, inert quantities until they're needed.
• If cyanide salts aren't considered to be WMD, then what compounds are?

Sleep well, tonight.

ON THE JACKSON BOOB FLASH EPISODE



I find it amazing that anyone would be surprised. Here is my bullet-point commentary:

• Janet Jackson's boobs are clearly fake.
• What else are we to expect from MTV, a channel that distinguishes itself with what is now the bland mix of teenage angst, sex, drug abuse, and "reality" shows? The really notable aspect about this whole episode was how pedantic whole thing was, despite the FCC investigation.
  
  
• The major networks will continue to see their viewership decline, as more and more parents get a clue. At least CBS has "Joan or Arcadia" to help stop the hemorrhaging.

Oh yeah, congratulations to the New England Patriots for a great win.

ESSENTIAL GOVERNMENT DECISION



The US State Department will now be using a new font -- Times New Roman 14 (via the Australian Broadcasting Corporation):

There are only three exceptions to the draconian new typographical rules: telegrams, treaty materials prepared by the State Department's legal affairs office and documents drawn up for the president's signature, it said.

The new font will replace Courier New 12.



Jonah Goldberg at National Review Online opines: "Good for the State Department. I hope Osama Bin Laden is paying attention."