On Biblical Mysticism

A great quote on the unique, rich physicality of biblical mysticism, from Richard N. Longenecker's excellent commentary Galatians:

Mysticism, of course, frequently conjures up ideas about he negation of personality, withdrawal from objective reality, ascetic contemplation, a searching out of pathways to perfection, and absorption into the divine - all of which is true for Eastern and Grecian forms of mysticism.  The mysticism of the Bible, however, affirms the true personhood of people and all that God has created in the natural world, never calling for negation or withdrawal except where God's creation has been contaminated by sin.  Furthermore, the mysticism of biblical religion is not some esoteric searching for a path to be followed that will result in union with the divine, but is always of the nature of a response to God's grace wherein people who have been mercifully touched by God enter into communion with him without ever losing their own identifies.

Posted via email from The Central Point

in sun

via flickr.com

Cole Rise is one of my favorite photographers. Randomly found his stuff on Flickr. His website is http://www.colerise.com.

Posted via web from The Central Point

David Hart on the Silliness of Contemporary Atheism

David B. Hart's excellent article in the May issue of First Things has to be read in all of its excellent entirety. Here's a taste (full article at the link, below):

A truly profound atheist is someone who has taken the trouble to understand, in its most sophisticated forms, the belief he or she rejects, and to understand the consequences of that rejection. Among the New Atheists, there is no one of whom this can be said, and the movement as a whole has yet to produce a single book or essay that is anything more than an insipidly doctrinaire and appallingly ignorant diatribe.

If that seems a harsh judgment, I can only say that I have arrived at it honestly. In the course of writing a book published just this last year, I dutifully acquainted myself not only with all the recent New Atheist bestsellers, but also with a whole constellation of other texts in the same line, and I did so, I believe, without prejudice. No matter how patiently I read, though, and no matter how Herculean the efforts I made at sympathy, I simply could not find many intellectually serious arguments in their pages, and I came finally to believe that their authors were not much concerned to make any. 

What I did take away from the experience was a fairly good sense of the real scope and ambition of the New Atheist project. I came to realize that the whole enterprise, when purged of its hugely preponderant alloy of sanctimonious bombast, is reducible to only a handful of arguments, most of which consist in simple category mistakes or the kind of historical oversimplifications that are either demonstrably false or irrelevantly true. And arguments of that sort are easily dismissed, if one is hardy enough to go on pointing out the obvious with sufficient indefatigability.

via firstthings.com

Posted via web from The Central Point

Without Missing a Beat

Without question, this is the single best sermon I've ever read on Acts 20:7-12.  The sermon is about the story of young Eutychus falling asleep and falling out of a window as Paul preached at length to the people of Troas.  The sermon has the added benefit of being hilarious, thanks to the wonderful gifts of the preacher, Rev. Will Willamon.

Posted via web from The Central Point

Disbelieving Preaching

William Willimon on the disbelief in contemporary preaching:

That many of us preachers still preach using essentially secular (i.e. godless) means of persuasion borrowed uncritically from the world is yet another testimony to our failure to believe that God raised Jesus Christ from the dead, thus radically changing everything. In so doing we act as if Jesus were still sealed securely in the tomb, as if he did not come back to us, did not speak to us and cannot, will not speak to us today, as if preaching is something that we do through our strategies rather than through the speaking of the risen Christ.

Resurrection is not only the content of gospel preaching but also its miraculous means. Where two are three of us are gathered in his name, daring to talk about him, he is there, talking to us (Matt. 18:20). All the way to the end of the age, in every part of the world, in our baptism and proclamation, he is with us (Matt. 28:20).

I once heard a church growth expert declare, “Any church that doesn’t have a pull down video screen will be dead in ten years.” But I believe that better technology does not make sermons work. Lack of technology cannot kill a church. Only God can kill a church. Only a living Christ can make our sermons speak to a new generation.

Can I get a hearty "amen?"  You'll want to read the whole thing here.

Posted via email from The Central Point

Quote of the Day

From Michael Horton's excellent book, "The Gospel-Driven Life: Being Good News People in a Bad News World":

We are not sick, but spiritually dead. We are not good people with room for improvement, but the ungodly. We are not children who need a little direction, but lost. The gospel comes not to help us get our act together, fixing us up for a night on the town, making us more respectable to ourselves or others. Rather, it comes to kill us and make us alive as completely new creatures. Not a new and improved self, but a self buried and raised with Christ, is the gospel's message of genuine transformation.

Posted via email from The Central Point

Peter Hitchens Author Interview--The Rage Against God

via youtube.com

I look forward to reading this.

Posted via web from The Central Point